Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="kingtidge, post: 313217, member: 994"] As I stated, I have read it. [LIST] [*]One person in the report stated Seasock's report "hampered" a prosecution. It was a rep. from the local victims support service. Not anyone from the DA's office and not a legal opinion. [*]The DA at the time had mysteriously disappeared in 1998 and was later presumed dead [*]The assigned prosecutor at the time from the DA's office refused to comment on the seasock report or any other matters surrounding Sandusky to Freeh [/LIST] You say the report prevented the prosecution. Chamber's is already on record stating she felt her report was sufficient. So, from a legal perspective, the Seasock prevented the prosecution of the case how exactly? And why wouldn't anyone from the DA's office explain why? Freeh wasn't able to determine that since no one from the DA's office would comment to him. How is it that you know? [/QUOTE]