Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="OrangePA, post: 313553, member: 204"] Clearly Chambers and others were convinced that the pattern was one of pedophelia - that Sandusky was engaging in the the process of "grooming." And clearly many in law enforcment tried to convince Seasock that his conclusion was way off base. So, yes you and I agree that many got it right in 1998, and Seasock got it wrong - way wrong. And yes, we apparently agree that the DA chose not to prosecute and likely chose not to do so because he could hang his hat on the Seasock conclusion. And yes, the Seasock conclusion was likely the one they - the DA and the school - wanted to believe Why are you arguing with me? Where do we differ here? Help me understand what you and others want me say? This seems to be a really pointless exercise at this point. Help!!! [/QUOTE]