Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="upperdeck, post: 3882613, member: 474"]
Its a tough thing to figure out..  much the same as golf..

it takes the skill and the mental aptitude to win these things..  Is it harder to be dominant and win a bunch when you have 4-5 guys who can win multiple ones and thus showing they have both skill sets and are more than a 2 week thing 6 match thing or harder when you have tons of talented guys who can beat you any given match but struggle to win 6 in a row at this level?

These guys winning 60 though in an era at the same time is pretty crazy.

Jack was winning his 20 a few won a few.  Tiger in his run much the same.

I have no doubt many other guys are playing at a high level but these 3 seem to rise up between them every major and knock the others off and just dont give in to all these kids,

Was talking about it yesterday during the match.. Nadel and Joker probably have 2-4 more years to be dominant.. given many players have a peek period of 5-6 yrs  These 3 guys will have taken 3+ groups out of winning majors where most of the time some of them would have won 3-4..

Tsistipas played great tennis and Joker looked lost but he got better and better until he makes the other guy not able to keep up..
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?