Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jncuse, post: 1675312, member: 1969"] Indeed it is way more important. I am only against those who say "must" win implying we are done otherwise. It's a better quality win, it relieves tension that would exist if we lost (for the players, who cares about us), and while the probability is high if we win either, there is more certainty for this. Win this game we are 95%+ (basically lock adjusted for committee error), win the other one instead we are closer to perhaps 75% (we are more susceptible to what happens around us). This is the clear game to win. I realized yesterday how much time I was wasting debating the scenario we lost this game, and how we can still get in with one more win. I told myself to stop debating that scenario until this game was over. It was a defeatist attitude -- let's worry about that after this game result is known. [/QUOTE]