Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Cuse181, post: 4909470, member: 8295"] My no lawyer opinion, but having read whatever excerpts from the GOR that I could, I'm not sure what FSU thinks constitutes as a “failure to perform” and “restraint of trade.” So far as I can see the agreement is simple: we broadcast and you get paid. The payments have been seemingly paid in full and on time, fulfilling the required actions. As for restriction of trade, that would seemingly set a precedent that every ongoing exclusivity contract is void, I doubt any court in the country would set that precedent. All in all, this is obviously a bid to push for a reduction in the exit fee to save the ACC legal fees but I have a hard time believing these fees would amount to anything more that 20-30M/year meaning fighting this out would be well worth the ACCs time [/QUOTE]