Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="orangecuse, post: 4910009, member: 668"]
I agree that it appears to be their best angle.

Or, possibly an angle that it violates public policy, and therefore deemed [I]unenforceable[/I] by the courts.  Just as you can not pass negligence through a contract regardless of how "iron clad" said hold-harmless/indemnification contract that seemingly exists.

[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/unenforceable-contracts-tips-33079.html[/URL]

[HEADING=2]Public Policy[/HEADING]
[HEADING=2][B]Impossibility[/B][/HEADING]
[I]In some cases, a contract is deemed unenforceable because it would be impossible or [B]impracticable[/B] to carry out its terms -- too difficult or too expensive, for example. To claim impossibility, you would need to show that:[/I]

[LIST]
[*]you can't complete performance under the contract because of some unexpected event that's not your fault
[*]the contract didn't make the risk of the unexpected event something you needed to shoulder, and
[*]performing the contract will be much more difficult or expensive now.
[/LIST]
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?