Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="NKR1978, post: 4912530, member: 186"] I'm glad you elaborated! This makes much more sense. FSU is going to throw a lot of nonsense at the wall hoping something sticks. I've seen some people say they have some legit arguments - but that's IF they're accurate presenting the facts of the case. If their timeline of events is accurate, there's some substance, but if they've relied on alternative facts, then it's weak. Given the number of typos and the general manner in which they've handled themselves, also stating that SMU has never been in a power conference, I have a feeling the ACC dotted its I's and crossed its T's when these things were drawn up. [/QUOTE]