Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="HtownOrange, post: 4913641, member: 622"]
The point is that FSU executed-and even fought for-the contracts.  Not openly stated but based on facts, FSU is claiming their lawyers were idiots and now they need help getting out of a bad deal they were told was a good deal.

Honestly, they would be better off using their legal and financial advisors.  But they can't sluff off blaming the advisors because the school educates professionals and has professionals on staff for this purpose.  In short, the lawsuit is their "hail Mary" pass with one receiver versus four DBs and an O-Line leaking like a sieve.  Their goal is to force the ACC into a negotiated settlement.

Even their demand to retroactively declare their intent to leave is a farce as it was not delivered by the due date as spelled out in the contract.  In short, they are declaring they are breaching the contract, refuse to comply with the contract and that the ACC must now down and kiss their feet on the way out.  Even Clemson, UVA, and UNC are not going to let them off that easy in spite of having and eye on the same opportunity.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?