Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="HRE Otto IV, post: 4958460, member: 5685"] I get USC and UCLA as they bumped up the new TV contract. FSU will not achieve that since the current contract is through 2029. I think FSU is a good add long term for the B18 but not now. Why take on FSU to decrease total revenue per team and increase travel costs? It is also a pain to schedule an odd number of teams. Unless FSU takes a half share like Oregon and Washington. Then it makes sense for the B18, but it then makes little sense for FSU. BTW if you are Oregon, Rutgers, Washington (Maryland too?) how can you vote for FSU to join at a full share when you are not getting one, you will make less money until 2030, and your costs go up? Also will the B18 require FSU to upgrade the airport like they did with Penn State? If so that is another major cost on top of the ACC exit fee and TV rights buyback. Looking at this logically it makes very little sense. And for FSU to do this all publicly makes things even worse. [/QUOTE]