Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="HtownOrange, post: 5039023, member: 622"]
The point was correct but not explained, apologies.  FSU "won" the point that they don't have a fiduciary duty to the ACC.  This will be used against both FSU and Clemson when they argue, as indicated in their respective complaints, in their respective courts that the ACC has a fiduciary responsibility to them.  Both have argued the ACC has a fiduciary duty to them (why they didn't argue the Sam for each school is beyond me).

Though the ACC argued FSU owes the ACC a fiduciary to the NC court, I think this was the ACC placing the argument in a favorable court and getting a ruling so they can use the same decision if necessary in the FL and SC courts, if necessary.

FSU "won" the argument in NC but the ACC has more use in the loss than FSU receives in the win.  If FSU and/or Clemson could win the fiduciary argument, which I don't think they can, they would have a stronger case.  Obviously, it remains to be seen whether the FL or SC courts will agree, but this is an indicator.

I hope this explains the matter better, especially as I didn't offer an explanation in the prior post.  Thus, your point is correct, the ACC wins by losing the argument in court.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?