Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="HRE Otto IV, post: 5114616, member: 5685"] They would still control all the money in an open system. The whole Super League proposal (semi closed) in Europe was for the top 15 teams to be permanent members and the last 5 to come from promotion/relegation. If CFB did something similar where the top 30 team were permanent members and the last 10 were subject to promotion/relegation, how is that any different than a closed system for those top teams? The top 30 schools would be safe. The next 30 or so schools would have access but would also be at a significant disadvantage when compared to the permanent 30. Really you are cutting the fat off of the mid to bottom of the B1G and SEC. Those schools instead of getting a free ride will have to earn their seat at the table. Schools outside those two conferences will have access, which will prevent any issues with the government. [/QUOTE]