Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="elimunelson, post: 5122988, member: 615"]
I don't think Scooch is saying FSU 1993 and 1999 would make the contracts equal.

ACC relies on FSU to be wicked awesome. They were hoping they got Miami and early ACC Vtech to be the 3 amigos. If anyone is to blame it's Miami. They have been awful since joining the ACC vs their historical relevance in the Big East. Which should be something FSU and Clemson should look at if they extracted themselves into the BIG/SEC. Of course it's all money and no one cares about the performance if the checks are guaranteed.

Clemson ironically became a second banana thankfully. The BIG will ALWAYS have these gigantic land grant schools (similar to the SEC) with their oodles of grads. We are going to constantly swim upstream vs them content wise and valuation wise. But being third isn't bad and having a contract tied up being third is not bad for SU and most of the ACC at this point.

Anyway, be thankful for ND, Swofford, ESPN and the ACCN, Crouthamel (for actually building the Big East and making SU Football great in the 80s hiring Mac), McNabb, Miami going on probation in/around 1995, and the Dome Ranger (why not)
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?