Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Finwad32, post: 2036007, member: 651"]
There's so much garbage rationalization in this thread, it's maddening. No comparisons are absolute. And it's funny how arguments change to fit narratives. I'm not talking about any one poster, I'm talking about the trend of the entire board.

Two completely different philosophies. Undabatable. Two completely different brands of football. No ifs and thens, this isn't logic. It's football.

Much like gambling, each individual game is its own unique circumstance. Seeing roulette hit black four times in a row does not increase the probability of a red on the 5th.

You can't say, but if we played this game with that philosophy the outcome would've been X as opposed to Y. It doesn't work that way.

Pros & Cons to both systems, you can't cherry pick key moments to apply against any other moment. The only thing you can do is look at the aggregate.

Which philosophy gets us closer to our ultimate goal. In this case, it was '16 vs '15 and '16 won. That was largely because bowl qualification standards were lower, but, we still had an additional win regardless. Style points mean .
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?