Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Townie72, post: 2713683, member: 780"] You are using facts. Unfortunately, but not unexpectedly, they are the wrong facts to make the point you wish were true. We don't agree what being a fluke constitutes. The key to understanding a fluke is its unlikeliness or its improbability. An Win-Expectancy analysis that looks back at what happened and uses the game statistics to show how the fluke occurred doesn't shine much light on how unusual the game was. If the two teams played 10 times last year, Clemson would have won 8. The rest of SUs season pretty much showed what the 2017 team was. [/QUOTE]