My one complaint about what he said, is that essentially the free education kids get means literally nothing.
getting out of college loans free matters a whole hell of a lot more than the fact I worked 30 hours a week while I was in grad school to have enough money to pay rent and for books so I didn't need to take out even more loans. I'll spend the next 20+ years of life paying off those loans. My experience is not exactly unique.
Given the choice between a free education, where I could only have minimal amounts of pocket change for spending, or working through college while having (very slightly) more pocket change, but $100,000+ in student loans, I'll take the first one every single time.
Oh and my face (along with a ton of other students nationwide) is on a handful of campus ads, pepsi ads with shots of the stands, I'm in the commercial that SU has been running every sporting event this year (and a good portion of last year), I don't see anybody clamoring to help me make some money off the numerous advertisements dollars both the campus, Pepsi and whoever else has my face on an ad has made. I didn't sign anything saying use of me in advertisements without compensation is OK. It's not like I don't need the additional funding (along with every other college kid or recent Grad in America) But I'm not going after Pepsi for it, and I consider it an honor, and exciting to be a part of those ads, and I have copies of them lying around that I can save and show to my kids those ads one day. If I pressed the advertising agencies for my money, supposing they would actually give me "my dues" (yeah right that would happen) it certainly wouldn't be as much money as C.J. Fair is owed, but I'd still be owed something, as they obviously saw something in the pictures I am in that enabled them to think it would help them move their product to the public.
So my point here, longwinded as it may be, is that a free education is not worthless, no matter what anybody thinks. It's on the kids to put it to good use once they have it. No matter what I (as a normal college student) was allowed to earn, a guy like Brandon Triche (who doesn't appear he will make it in the NBA) is so much further ahead in his life financially than I am, despite me working 30 hours a week during my college tenure.
Who said it was worthless? Nobody - merely that it is not enough. As for your likeness - what is your market value? When SU puts your picture on a sweatshirt and sells it then call a lawyer but until then you granted your permission to use your likeness, voice etc when you bought your ticket.
Who said it was worthless? Nobody - merely that it is not enough. As for your likeness - what is your market value? When SU puts your picture on a sweatshirt and sells it then call a lawyer but until then you granted your permission to use your likeness, voice etc when you bought your ticket.
The NCAA does well for much that it does. Is it perfect? No. If the NCAA is abolished then another governing body will need to be established. It's probably better to revamp what's there. The NCAA is a member-run organization. For change to happen, the institutions need to make them.The NCAA is a failed institution and it is probably time for it to go away.
I like the idea of student representatives when rules and infractions are being discussed. If anything, it would keep the NCAA honest when they are about to do something crazy like giving that kid 80 hours of community service and a suspension for $270 worth of 'improper benefits'.The NCAA does well for much that it does. Is it perfect? No. If the NCAA is abolished then another governing body will need to be established. It's probably better to revamp what's there. The NCAA is a member-run organization. For change to happen, the institutions need to make them.
I think the best way to work this out is provide an alternative to college athletics as a means to get to a pro sport rather than forcing kids to go through college as the not for profit NFL does.
Haven't seen the original comments, but better watch out for this one. As I understand the NCAA's goals, keeping student-athletes in amateur status is pretty much the end goal of the entire organization. Thus, no cash payments or other typical salary considerations. The scholarship is considered a form of payment in kind. If you're an employee now, that is just plain payment, and here come the taxes on it....
I think Jay makes a good point in that by the IRS definition of an employee it seems like the athletes are employees, plus coaches can go where they want, players, can't etc.
That just doesn't fit in the current university model. A full-cost-of-attendance stipend is fine. A portion of jersey sales profits in an account payable upon graduation (pro-rated for those leaving early) might work as well. 4/5 year scholarships instead of a series of 1-year scholarships is good too.Football & Basketball players should be paid when the schools and head coaches are making millions.
Not just for the players, but also for the athletic departments as they lose their tax-free status.If you're an employee now, that is just plain payment, and here come the taxes on it.
Your first paragraph is hilarious...Taking Digger's lead here and your statement about unions is anything but "typical". Blaming unions for NBA players pissing away there money is unbelievable. Wow...does it say that on the ticket?
I don't pretend to know what the right move is, but in my experience with unions, and the point Digger tried to make, is that typically they help themselves more than the people they represent. 70% of NBA players bankrupt within 5 years of retirement... that is staggering. So for at least 70% of those players, that representation was useless,
I think Jay makes a good point in that by the IRS definition of an employee it seems like the athletes are employees, plus coaches can go where they want, players, can't etc.
I think the best way to work this out is provide an alternative to college athletics as a means to get to a pro sport rather than forcing kids to go through college as the not for profit NFL does.
If players want to be paid then they should join a pro (development) league. I suspect this development league would be far less glamorous than the current high profile apprenticeships at the country's colleges and universities.
If you're a top football prospect, would you prefer to make $50-100k and play in front of 4,000 fans, or earn a degree and have access to top-flight facilities and play in front of 80,000+ fans. While some will opt for the former, will there really be enough players to form a league? While most players hope for an NFL opportunity, very few actually reach that goal. For the vast majority, utilizing their athletic skills to acquire an education and present them with a better future than they'd otherwise have would be the smart route.
Nothing personal, but if you asked this question to the P5 football and hoops teams, I'm guessing it would be close to 80/20 for getting paid and being in a developmental league. Look at how many early-entry guys are in this year's NFL Draft- they aren't all early round picks.
It's easy for us to hold to this notion that most student-athletes think about their post-playing days, but right now every single SU player who finished his eligibility is working out with the idea of making a NFL camp. Some might have other jobs or grad school lined up, but all of them are preparing for pro day.
The NCAA should change before the NFL forms a developmental league and takes these players.
Who said it was worthless? Nobody - merely that it is not enough. As for your likeness - what is your market value? When SU puts your picture on a sweatshirt and sells it then call a lawyer but until then you granted your permission to use your likeness, voice etc when you bought your ticket.
cayugacuse after you finish jumping to a conclusion, re-read that please. I didn't blame the unions for anything. I pointed out that 70% of their members were broke within 5 years and said that if that stat is true that is crazy. I guess my question to you would be, how did the union help those players? and how much did those players pay the union for the help that they received?Your first paragraph is hilarious...Taking Digger's lead here and your statement about unions is anything but "typical". Blaming unions for NBA players pissing away there money is unbelievable. Wow...