Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="orangecuse, post: 2773396, member: 668"]
Well, I wasn't spewing any crap, but only attempting to point out that we'll have to clean up our sloppiness and be sharper to stand a chance next week in the Bronx against ND.  But yet you felt the need to be antagonistic in response, and coming after me where I wasn't even communicating with you to begin with. Go revisit them, if you wish, and you'll see for yourself.  You clearly won't be able to quote anything of mine in there that was anything more. Go revisit Lefty's post and Sobe's as well.  I'll stand by what I said last night, however, that you have this way about you in being truculent, it really isn't anything new.

Moreover, it's a game thread, where emotions are always high and in the moment, etc. Jeez, I recall the UNC game thread a few weeks back where some [I]'well respected[/I]' posters could've really used a Snickers, but hey, again, it's the game thread, and you have to take it with a grain of salt.

You don't have to agree with them or their viewpoint, but you don't have to be antagonistic or belittling, which is another tendency of yours.  Your response to my post(s) is just an example, actually, you changed your one post/response 3 separate times!  First, with a condescending [I]"Wowza"[/I] and then deleting that, and substituted it with the [I]screaming character [/I]attachment.   Then, yet again, removed that and substituted it with the belittling[I] "objectiveness" "LMFAO!" [/I]Completely unnecessary.  But hey, kudos to you though, you managed to do it within the 4 minute allotment window, so the 'edited' message didn't show up in your response dialog.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?