Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Cusefan95, post: 4782262, member: 173"] Agree…there’s more to this than “coach hooks up with student”. Even if the University has a very broad rule (no dating other university employees ever..), it’s a guarantee they’ve looked the other way in situations where the two people would realistically not have contact in the workplace. So he’d have an argument for selective enforcement - it’s part of why extremely broad rules like that are basically pointless. There’s some other critical information which is the true cause for this leave of absence. I’m not sure why anybody would get worked up about what’s come out so far - UNLESS they are thinking along my line of reasoning and are confident there are details which have not come out yet which will reframe this in a much more unsavory light. [/QUOTE]