Only somewhat related, but as the endless debates about star ratings drag on, I thought about an interesting study that someone should do. Comb through the recruiting ratings over the years, and find cases where a rating seems out of whack with the offer sheet or other factors. Then see how on the field results compare. That would seem to be the true measure of a rater's skill - not the cases where they simply slap a 4- or 5-star label on a kid who has offers from Alabama, U$C, FSU, Texas, etc.