Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="N.Y. Orangeman, post: 35257, member: 21"] Thanks, Neil. Kyle, you are distorting my point. I'm not arguing with you about where the numbers stand currently; I'm stating that these will change and narrow in the next round of negotiations, and, for that matter, probably in future ones. The other piece which is of relevance is the population shifts which are currently trending away from the B10. This will become increasingly relevant, especially in a fifty year decision which this undoubtedly is. I'm familiar with the B10 network and the contract (as well as how an exit could befinancially structured). However, I disagree with the static assumptions you base your revenue figures on in the intermediate and beyond. If you have a source or a report for the Maryland to B1G statement, I'd love to see it. [/QUOTE]