Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="kingtidge, post: 192267, member: 994"] Does anyone else think there's something a little odd about the scheduling clause in WV's buyout regarding their requirement to help us and PITT schedule fill-in games next year? Why is that legally binding as part of the buyout? What 'azz-covering' is Marinatto trying to do with that? Couple that with TGD's stated comments about the fact that there is zero possibility of a 2-game series with Buttgers and it makes me think that there is a breach of contract issue outstanding for the BE if they don't handle this scheduling dilemma properly... and that perhaps TGD is posturing for a sooner (2012) exit than later (2013) if our legal team thinks they have a legitimate legal breach? I really have no idea if that is the case or even plausible... but that WV scheduling clause and TGD's posturing has me thinking some other considerations are in play that we don't know... [/QUOTE]