Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="reedny, post: 204197, member: 1423"] I saw it too -- but I'm not going to give him the satisfaction. His schtick is pure shock-jock, not dispassionate analyst. Bilas would have said, 'they're 29-1 and took the BE title by withstanding a furious UConn rally in a tough road venue (unlike Ky and KU that survived scares at home)'. Instead, the shock-jock praises Ky for scraping by Vandy at home (without seeing any contradiction) and (with no mention of the fact that SU clinched the BE title) calls the team out for 'struggling' in the second half against a 'Bad' Uconn team (with no regard for how well UConn played in the second half). Pointing out only negatives when there are so many positives (and such an amazing record) is just not accurate. But ... anything to stir up hits, right? [/QUOTE]