Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="SUlax88-09, post: 5429151, member: 9879"] Great points. I agree with you. At least in terms of how I evaluate a team though, I look for: On offense -who wins the 1v1 matchups -who moves without the ball -who finds the open players -who limits turnovers -who shoots better On defense -who wins the 1v1 matchups -who slides to help (and who doesn’t slide to help too early) -who creates turnovers -who clears better And which goalie plays better Man-up and Man-down teams are also important (kind of like special teams in football) I think Harvard was better than us at almost every one of those measures above (except for man-up and man-down performance), but I think we won because we dominated face-offs (even the man-up run we had in the 4th was only possible because we dominated the face-offs). We dominated face offs, so we got a lot more possessions, which means more shots and more shots on goal. Their goalie finished the game with a 46% save percentage, which is not that good. It was still obviously better than McCools 29% save percentage, but wait ‘til you see Princeton’s goalie, Croddick! He’s excellent. In years past, it’s been the opposite, and we’ve lost playoff games just because we got dominated at face-offs, even though we were the better offense and defense. I used to hate that feeling! I may be in the minority, but I think the face-off should be removed from the game. In the end though, face offs domination can only carry a team so far, and if we don’t play better on offense, defense, and in goal, then even if we dominate face-offs against Princeton, it still won’t be enough. Also I’m thrilled that lacrosse will be in the ‘28 LA Olympics, and although Sixes is not ‘real lacrosse’, I am looking forward to watching a lacrosse game where face-offs are basically eliminated. May the best ‘team’ win (unfortunately, it may be Canada) [/QUOTE]

Verification: What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?