Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="swish7, post: 4480642, member: 486"] It was a well earned 'dislike'. I wear it with pride. That's why I added 'in retrospect'. A shorter extension would have been nice, in retrospect. We cannot have our cake and eat it too. We cannot not have the money to hire and fire people at will, and also be so concerned about continuity. Maybe we should embrace being a stepping stone. Let Marrone move on. Let Babers move on. Hope there is a buyout. Embrace being a great spot for new up and comers. But, no, we extend Babers & there is no clause giving us any outs if he absolutely poops the bed. Which he did. Again, all in retrospect. Best record in 65 years and fired for going 6-6. His replacements were all worse. If 'continuity' is the argument, then give me 18 years of .500 ball under 1 coach, instead of 18 years of .389 ball under 4 coaches. [ATTACH type="full"]222958[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]