Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="GoSU96, post: 1039364, member: 114"] All that doesn't really answer my question. SU showed $10M more in revenue than expenses in 2012 for the athletic department. It's the only program in D-1 that reported greater than $25M in basketball revenue (2nd in D-1) and $33M (33rd in D-1) in football. Every school uses football, or at least tries to, use football to fund the rest of their programs. Not sure what the scandal is there. There is no evidence that football is unduly burdened because of spending on other programs. In fact because SU is in a unique position based upon the cash flows from basketball that it is probably less impacted than the largest programs in the SEC/BIG/ND. [/QUOTE]