Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Here is what I know (2nd hand - somewhat long)
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="sutomcat, post: 465964, member: 27"] What happens over the next 10 days will largely determine the future of Syracuse football for the next 10, 20 even 30 years. The university needs to make a decision. Does it want to invest next to nothing in facilities and coaches, cash its checks from the ACC, make football a reliable cash cow with a low ceiling for additional earnings and live with playing home games in a near empty Dome/being a perennial doormat in football? Or do they want to have a consistent winning program, a near full Dome, go to bowl games most every year and compete for conference and national championships? IMHO, you can't go halfway on this. You either consciously decide not to try/become the Rutgers of the ACC or you go all in and try to be the best. UL just had the same decision. They extended Strong for big dollars. UC just had a similar decision. They hired a big name and committed to making major infrastructure improvements. It is more though than just extending DM's contract and giving him a sizable raise. If the decision is to go all in, the university needs to commit the money coming in from the move to the ACC to the athletic department. I think all DM is asking for is a commitment to allow football to be self sustaining. The university had an excellent program that was a cash cow back in the Mac and early/mid Coach P eras. They chose to milk the profits and not invest them back into the program and soon the milk was gone. The same thing happened with Schwartzwalder and the football program in the late 1950s/1960s. We had a great program, made a lot of money and didn't invest it in keeping the program competitive. Is the university short sighted enough to drive the program to ruin a third time in 50 years? We might as well know where things stand before we play a game in the ACC. Those in power, please be forward thinking and aware of the past. Make the smart decision. All DM is asking is to invest the money the football program will be making in the football program. The good a successful football program does in terms of visibility, admissions, ability to raise funds, etc. is well documented. And the more the team wins, the more money comes in from bowl games, TV, gate revenues, concessions, seat licensing, merchandise licensing, etc. This should be a no brainer... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Here is what I know (2nd hand - somewhat long)
Top
Bottom