Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="SkanSU, post: 98909, member: 53"] First let me say one thing: Bernie is innocent until proven guilty ... it is the cornerstone of our legal system and as long as he continues to deny the allegations he is innocent. Second, IMO JB should not be fired, forced to resign, etc. ... he has been a person who has shown great allegiance to a friend of 50 years. It's unfortunate that JB is so outspoken and sometimes speaks with foot in mouth ... but that, to me, is not an offense that requires that the University fire him or force him to resign. Hoaston, to me, is a man looking for his 15 minutes of fame. Should JB make another apology ... sure, why not. But he should not be forced to grovel at the feet of Hoaston and his crew. It really does nothing for the victims of sexual crimes. OK, now I have made my responses to all of the threads on the board ... easy. On to my questions. As we know the feds are now on the case ... in fact everybody seems to be jumping on the bandwagon including the US Dept. of Education? How many nvestigations can you have going for Chrissakes! Tax payer money at work. Anyway some people believe that the reason the feds are on board is because of the Adam Walsh Law ... removing the SOL for child abuse. For the lawyers ... my question is can this law be applied retroactively to its passage (2006)? The PS implies that the reason the feds are in is b/c of the Tomaselli accusation and the possibility of transporting across state lines. To me Tomaselli has almost no credability considering his pending child abuse charges and his father adamently stating it ain't so. But given the possibility that the Walsh Law is not retroactive than the state lines thing is the only reason for fed involvement. And what the hell is the US Dept. of Education investigating anyway? [/QUOTE]

Verification: What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?