Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="sholokov2, post: 2520035, member: 6629"]
I got all excited about Kennedy at LSM and then I remembered with your help, Fusco plays there.  He did not play badly against UVA, but against Army he seemed slow to react.  So, let's leave Kennedy on the wing and watch Bomberry and Fusco closely.  Kennedy could sub for either.  Williams is a big dude who loves to force his way to the middle of the field and unload mostly with his left hand high.  Bomberry might be a fit because he could barge his way through a screen.  Stanwyck is a puzzle.  His brothers improved over their careers until as seniors they were very dangerous x guys.  He seems to disappear for periods and when he reappears he has trouble getting around single coverage.  Still demands close coverage though.  It's Tinney and Desimone who can score in different ways.  Petro, for my money, overuses Tinney on d and exhausts him until he loses offensive effectiveness in the second halves of games.  He does not have the stamina of a Conrad.  I'd like to see Murphy on one of the two, probably Desimone.  Marr is a pure shooter.  Have to make him move off his spots or he'll score a ton.

On offense, Bomberry is a puzzle.  I have not been paying enough attention.  Maybe they try this all the time.  How about a two man game with Rehfuss around the goal.  It might be a way to free him without the need for him to dodge.  As far as the third attack, count me clueless.  Voigt seems to need that good passing, double drawing x.   How about 4 middies and a thousand inverts.  Curry, Dordevic, Dearth and Trimboli, with Rehfuss and Voight or Bomberry.  Seebold maybe.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?