Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="upperdeck, post: 393282, member: 474"] I think UL is the best.. I dont think they have played near as well as the talent level I think USF has the most athletic groups if all football required was kids who could run around clueless I think Pitt has the most football talent , but again poorly coached so far I think rutgers has a bunch of athletes almost like USF, but like the WR they are athletic but not great football players , on D you can get away with that, not so much on O. Cinci has the play makers on offense to scare you when they make plays. I think SU has only uconn and temple behind them for pure athleticism on the roster, but we have only UL/Cinci to compare to in how much coaching is getting done to overcome the talent gap. [/QUOTE]