Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Ghost, post: 1560916, member: 581"] It's not anti-Cooney. There was an anti-Scoop movement once, but people thinking our recruiting and player development has left us with a 40 MPG shooting guard of Cooney's ilk, is not the same as anti-Cooney. Nobody is saying were better off without him, suggesting walk-ons are better, or hoping he drops out of school (as we saw with scoop) , just that three years of this is odd. I'm not sure who could conclude that TC should be a 38 MPG player on a team at the level we think we are... He is a very nice player, and most everyone would readily concede that IMO. Should we be concerned our coaches have so much trouble teaching/implementing this defense that we can't sit people for more than a couple minutes? It's an ongoing issue now... We can only teach one player per position this defense... If that? [/QUOTE]