Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="jncuse, post: 1691312, member: 1969"]
It is amusing to me that Lunardi is still ranting on how inconsistent the committee was this year.  The worst yet he claims.   He can't figure out where he went wrong, and says he is unable to analyze his losses for future years.   This is the guy that for some reason says he can understand why Vanderbilt got in, but can't understand Syracuse.

[I]Take away Syracuse and we both got 2 wrong.       But I can make sense of how the bubble was selected (even Tulsa), see that it is reasonable and use it is as a point moving forward.  I'm just  not sure why he can't.   [/I]

1) They picked the teams with quality wins first and they had more respect for the AAC because they were a little deeper this year.
2) For the rest who all have major warts,  pick the teams that are best on paper / eye test/ KP (Wichita St / Vandy)

It would be a bailout to purely rely on #1, if the leftovers did not have one glaring issue.   [U]But each one had a glaring issue that was actually beyond simply lack of opportunity to win top games
[/U]
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?