Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Cheriehoop, post: 4778559, member: 127"]
If it makes a difference I never saw him spinning to get hit. He was running and had changed direction towards his right before the hit from what I saw. He was hit from his blind side. Never knew that a runner was responsible for giving an opponent a clear more direct target to hit. Isn’t the reason he turned to the right because he saw a more open field? If Shrader had gotten taken down from behind by a horse collar would that rule be interpreted differently because the runner should have been responsible and assumed that someone was going to catch up with him? The Clemson player hit him high when chasing him from his blind side and in the collision the force of the hit to Shrader‘s helmet forced his helmet half over Shrader’s face as his head was twisted and he was falling and fumbling. (Also clearly shown in a later picture on Syracuse.com) With your definition, there is no such thing as targeting or do you reserve a No targeting rule for just specific players for some reason?
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?