Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Crusty, post: 1571324, member: 2265"] I can agree with part of that. Lester pretty much had a little of everything (hence the "multiple" moniker}. He had zone read, play action and some triple option. I think that was its downfall. We really weren't very good at any one thing. It seemed to me he was searching all season. In the beginning, we ran more pays from the double wing and then at the end very little (I did not see the BC game as it was blacked out here). That may account for the up and down O Line performance. I don't think he ever figured it out, but defenses did. I understand that he was moving away from the heavy formation with two tight ends and was going to jettison it next year. Lester, to his credit was more willing to throw in the red zone and achieved considerable improvement there. However, that was about the only area we improved on offense. [/QUOTE]