Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="moqui, post: 3204541, member: 214"]
yes it's early and yes the numbers may be skewed by weaker competition,but that is the same for every school.

so here is how some of our guys rank among acc players in various statistical categories, courtesy of [URL='https://kenpom.com/playerstats.php?s=ORtg&=ACC']kenpom[/URL]

whether or not this means our guys could start for other acc teams or not, i think many people are going to be surprised.  and i think its clear that our guys, young as they are, are for the most part pretty competitively ranked among acc rotation players

[B]offensive rating[/B] (minimum 40% of team minutes played).  95 qualified players
elijah 10
marek 14
bourama 22
jgiii  46
buddy 64
quincy 83

[B]effective fg%[/B] (minimum 60% of minutes played)  59 qualified players
marek 12
elijah 14
jgiii 33
buddy 34

[B]true shooting%[/B] (minimum 60% of minutes played)  59 qualified players
elijah 11
marek 19
jgiii 26
buddy 45

[B]offensive rebounding %[/B] (minimum 40% minutes played) 95 qualified players
bourama 16
quincy  17
marek  24
eiljah  89
buddy  91
jgiii  95

[B]defensive rebounding %[/B] (minimum 40% minutes played) 95 qualified players
bourama 10
quincy 11
elijah 51
marek 63
jgiii  83
buddy 89

[B]block percentage[/B] (minimum 40% minutes played) 95 qualified players
quincy 9
elijah 15
bourama 18
marek 28
buddy  55
jgiii 63

[B]steal percentage[/B] (minimum 40% minutes played) 95 qualified players
jgiii  3
marek  18
buddy 48
quincy 52
elijah 58
bourama 61

[B]assist rate[/B] (minimum 40% minutes played) 95 qualified players
jgiii 5
elijah 11
buddy 21
marek 40
quincy 90
bourama  92
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?