Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="SWC75, post: 101539, member: 289"] That's the statement that worries me. If he's going to take the position that he had no way of knowing what was going on he probably shouldn't describe it as "his watch". I thought he's been superb in both this and the Colgate news conference but I think his apology for his intial statement needs to be a little more specific, unless he had inside info about Davis and Lang that indicates they were out for $$$. He keeps saying you shuldn't make judgements until the invetigation is over and you have all the facts. If he ahd no specific informaiton that showed that Davis and Lang were on the make, then that's exactly what he did not do. [/QUOTE]