Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="cuse309, post: 2388529, member: 5119"] Ahhh, glad you brought up wake. Clawson 3-9 in year 1, 3-9 in year 2 (uh oh...he's supposed to rebuild us he obviously can't). 7-6 in year 3 (coincidence that year 3 is when the majority of the starters were his recruits?) 7-4 with a possibility to win 9 in year 4. Now the vast majority of his recruits are starting and on the 2 deep adding [I][B]quality depth.[/B][/I] Clawson also red shirts nearly every single player for the sole purpose of building quality depth. The Wake turn around, if it does truly turn the program around, is following the exact blueprint, and timeframe, and w-l record by year, that just about every successful rebuild has followed. I'm not saying that the fact Dino's teams have struggled in years 1 and 2 is proof that he's the man, but it is proof that the sky is not falling, and that there is no real reason to worry yet. Next year, if we don't win 6, then maybe cause for concern. Year 4...different story. [/QUOTE]