Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Ghost, post: 2017995, member: 581"] I think those guys stick around though for what you get at the end. Patterson is finally a volume shooter and hits 38% of his threes at whatever crap school he's at. And he could actually play defense. It's like James Sutherland. The return in years 1 and 2 is negligible, year 3 is so-so, then the payoff. I'm not saying he should be here, just that having no continuity, and losing guys early, leaves a leadership void, and depth problems. You end up with 5th year seniors that have no clue in the zone, and offer how much more? [/QUOTE]