Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="dinosaurbbq, post: 1207364, member: 1333"] This is wrong. Way wrong. Our RB's stats are severely undercut by the absolutely nonsensical decision to sub our RBs so frequently. PTG getting 15-20 touches a game would have had better numbers than a lot of RB in the ACC. More important still, our offense SUCKS and we can't pass the ball at all. That means teams stack the run and from what I've seen, they have. In my opinion, even with those aspects impacting our running backs, our RBs (PTG, DMF, Erv, AAM and GMII in that order) are much more talented than those at a number of ACC schools, including off the top of my head BC, UVA, Clemson, Va Tech, and UNC. [/QUOTE]