Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="HRE Otto IV, post: 5585884, member: 5685"] Agree on Nixon. His first 17 games IMO he was too pass happy (over 60%) and when he did run we had poor results. When he mixed things up well though we looked great (Clemson this year as an example). The run game is an issue with him. But there is no doubt that his passing attack with a good QB is elite. So the question is for a school like SU is it better to be elite at one thing and poor at another, or is it better to be decent at both? As long as Angeli is here I would have to go with elite at one thing. It isn't ideal but I think it gives us our best shot at getting over 7 Ws. There certainly will be a question long term on what happens when Angeli is gone. We saw that as a big fat failure this year. What happens in three years? Ideally I would want our 2012 O but I am not sure how we replicate that. [/QUOTE]