Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="rrlbees, post: 19100, member: 96"] Here's my problem with the poll. They didn't "poll" or "survey" anyone. It was sort of an opt-in type thing if you knew about the poll. That makes it far more random than if they had called 30,000 people randomly themselves. Those kinds of polls are always garbage in a way. Go look at the post pinned at the top about the coaches poll and Marrone. We came across that poll and we tacked it and asked people to vote for Marrone. He has risen about 30 places since we did that. School ABC who may not have seen the poll, or got actively involved with it, may have a better coach but that poll will never reflect that. So in this case, a scientific poll of 2,000 IMO is better than this 30,000 solely because of how the 30,000 was obtained. [/QUOTE]