Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="anomander, post: 1424737, member: 2766"] Again you list 2 players. This works overall, not a case here or a case there. And like I said who cares how they got their rating as long as they got it? So what UF came in and Clark got 3 stars? He is still 3 stars, and fits just fine with the criteria in the article. Plus don't you think he deserves 3 stars? Obviously he's a good player or UF or Nichigsn wouldn't have got involved. There is a reason Clark and pickard had UF and Michigan offers where Anthony Guidice did not. And how doesn't it prove the rest? They had 5 different grouping, based on final ranking. The data matches up top to bottom. The only problem is there is data that supports 1 argument, and no data for the other. [/QUOTE]