Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Bambrewer, post: 1425502, member: 4728"]
I swore I wasn't going to post in this thread again but here I go. I don't need data I went to the camps I spoke to the directors I have talked to the other parents and kids with similar experiences. All the data proves is once again what people are saying over and over. 4 and 5 star kids are no doubt great players no one is saying They get those kids wrong. The problem is you create a business based on telling kids come to camp and we will evaluate you based on your talent and rank you. That's what they tell you. It's what the built their business on. The kids go to these camps and get pushed off for the hyped kid. The kid that his coach pushed him to the sites or he knows some one. The other 90 percent never get an evaluation. Then the kid gets an offer. Ok the top 5 coaches want him 4 stars or 5 stars. Ok Syracuse and these other places want him ok 3 stars or 2 stars. If you haven't looked at a kid don't rate him. If he goes to your camp give him a rating based on how he did. Once again if the top kids go to the schools who's coaches are why the sites decide how many stars to give they will always have high ranking star percentages. Those kids are great. Our problem is the 3 star and 2 star kids who are just given a number could be 5 star talent not 5 star offered.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?