Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="OrangePA, post: 1369523, member: 204"]
Once again, the OP was not a request for feedback on what questions should be asked or should not be asked.

It was an effort secure points of view on issues that the new AD will likely face.

So, perhaps you took this particular question a bit too literally.

The inquiry is to what extent should the AD be involved in a academic issues facing a particular athlete - should the AD "brainstorm" ways to restore eligibility? Or, should the AD allow only the academic support staff/academic professionals address the issue?

Should the AD think "do I want it on the front page of the Post Standard that I became involved in strategy sessions designed to restore academic eligibility"?

I guess that's what the question was seeking to probe - what the prospective AD feels is appropriate involvement or inappropriate involvement.

And if I were a member of the Board of Trustees I would want to know how the prospective AD views his role in that regard.

So, I don't see it as a pejorative question at all.

You feel that there is nothing wrong with brainstorming the issue.

I am not as certain as you are in that regard.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?