Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="javadoc, post: 1369655, member: 338"] [LIST] [*]Yes. [*]Yes, and I would not only have allowed it, I would have recommended it. [*]No idea, don't know enough about them. [*]No idea, don't know enough about her. [*]Let me see the proposals that have been drawn up and I'll let you know. It seems like a sound structure, apart from the potential roofing problems, which may or may not be overblown. From an outsider's perspective, it seems you have more pressing problems than worrying about a perfectly functional stadium/arena. [*]I want to make sure that every team has the ability to practice during the athletic season, and that there are not collisions. Do we need to build anything new? I don't know. But I don't think teams should have to "wait their turn" to practice. [*]I don't know. Who is it? [*]Yes, because PC is for losers. [*]Is the approach really "Oregon-like"? What exactly do you mean by that? I prefer a stable, classic uniform design that clearly calls out a brand. What are the financial implications of various uniform suppliers' offerings? [*]He's fine unless the wheels fall off. Next year is the judgment year. [*]Let me talk to him first. I've heard some good things, though, and he seems invested. [*]I don't even want to think about adding sports until the finances settle down and the implications of NCAA changes shake out. I'd also want to look at our conference peers to see where we stand with regard to the totality of our sports options. The next couple years are not a great time to be adding sports, IMO. [*]Yes we should. In fact, I think the stipend should be uniform across the entire NCAA, for schools that choose to offer it. This is assuming we retain a "cost of attendance" type of model, and we're not talking about suddenly paying players above the table, and we get into $10K levels of cash. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]

Verification: What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?