Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="wfschrec, post: 421243, member: 361"] Obviously this has gotten to you since you were up at 1:30 am responding LOL ... As for the above you aren't worth wasting my time going back and analyzing every single piece of garbage you have posted throughout this season however I know I have seen you post things indicating our only opponent with less talent was SB ... of course you decide to tell us that 5 wins was an unrealistic expectation and low and behold we will wrap up a 7th this weekend. The fact of the matter is you have the same story week in and week out we have less talent ... we as fans have an unrealistic expectation that SU can and will win ... its old ... your lines are old your defense of the former coach P regime is old. I had no problem sleeping last night as I can see you can't say the same. And once again I don't really care whether you referenced Temple, RU, Pitt or Mizzou. The only team on our schedule more talented than SU was USC .. that was it ... and the results and box scores of the games reflect exactly what I am saying. You base who is more talented on the simple fact that RU pulled out a one score game in their own house ... so what you are saying is the better more talented team always wins right? So far we are more talented than Mizzou, Pitt, UConn, USF (and your boy BJ Daniels), Louisville and SB using your logic. If you base it on the numbers we were better at the LOS than RU ... flat out simple. JJ 2.3 ypc ... Smith 4.5 ... Nassib racks up 350+ passing yards ... Nova 150+ are you serious? SU had more TFLs but boy RU sure won that battle at the LOS. Look I get it, you support the coaching staff through thick and thin and believe Marrone is the guy and I have never once asked for his termination or even questioned his competency as a matter of fact I have defended him more often than naught ... however the talent argument isn't even valid ... discipline sure but not talent. These things will sort themselves out in the long run but if the only way you can say that RU was more talented/physical is because you observed it ... well I just have to laugh you aren't Tom Donahoe or Bill Polian ... and it ain't even close. The numbers say otherwise and in most games we were more talented and physical and considering it was only Pugh's second game back it was a good offensive performance and the D-Line made their run game look more pathetic than usual. Put those teams on a neutral field with both at full strength and SU wins it ... period. [/QUOTE]

Verification: What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?