Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Its time for Wildhack to step up
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="reedny, post: 2720901, member: 1423"] I agree with the OP about our disappointing D. Getting big-boyed by a bottom-feeder like Pitt is no fun to watch. Looking at the bigger picture, however, it's clear that expectations are running ahead of team talent. Even with a few upstart freshmen playing, we have glaring deficiencies all over the field. Two of the three offensive skill positions - WR and RB - are bottom of the ACC, as are two of the three defensive positions - secondary and LB's. We have one good cover corner and our run support is inconsistent. Our secondary problems have been masked by a good DL and a potent pass-rush. But realistically, we can't expect to win consistently in the ACC with holes at multiple skill positions on both sides of the ball. As far as this game goes, it was not on Dungey. Yes he got stripped and made a poor decision at the end. But the 37 points we scored came mostly from his playmaking, not talent at the RB or WR positions. With a big fast RB and a speedy receiver, in this scheme, we'd have scored 50+. And with one or two decent LBs, Pitt would have scored one TD. Instead, like Clemson, they just stepped on us - on multiple drives with no passing. On all but two plays during those drives (one by Armstrong and one by Trill), our LB's got blown away and our safeties either couldn't stop - or couldn't catch - their big runners. Ollison, alone, ran for almost 200 yards with an 8 yard average. You're not going to win giving up numbers like that, especially with one playmaker on offense. Are these problems scheme (Ward) or talent? I think it's the latter. Meanwhile, as Babers re-stocks the skill positions, I will enjoy seeing Dungey compete. Probably a 6-6 season and a marginal bowl. Not only has he been fun to watch, it's amazing what he's able to accomplish with a limited running game and pretty much no one to throw to. Howard and Neal did what they could. But at the end of the day - like many other positions - they're too small and too slow to put us over the top. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Its time for Wildhack to step up
Top
Bottom