Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Ghost, post: 3181978, member: 581"]
At this point I'm just sort of enjoying the hypothetical nature of these arguments, as I think we're a rather poorly constructed team...and I couldn't watch yesterday's game so I have no strong views on JGIII yet.

I suppose my concern at the moment is that this "JC is awful narrative," and he seems like he is as a PG if we're being honest, will be validated solely by the fact that we're going to run into a game where JGIII struggles (likely against better D) and then we go to JC, who also struggles, but without the benefit of doing some damage against the likes of......Seattle HS.

So, it is a bit strange to elevate one kid into the starter's role, give him all the minutes against the crap team, whom hopefully everyone will deal with rather well, and then expect the benched kid to jump back in and thrive...with the opportunity to do so being based on practice, which almost assuredly is where he must have won the job in the first place????  No?  Because if he didn't, then what are we doing exactly?  Token starters...randomly assigned...and then benched because that token strategy has a 2 game expiration?  Just seems all rather strange and misguided.

Anyway, maybe JC is a bad kid who lost his mind after the Colgate game.

Still, just for the record, more in it for the debate, than any concrete opinion at this point.  Too early for that.  :)
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?