Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="GoSU96, post: 1720906, member: 114"]
Exactly.   You break down the report to its elements and it's BS.     They applied a standard of liability ex post facto to Boeheim in a scenario where he was specifically excluded from being involved in.

A series of minor, isolated, disconnected events taking place over a extended period of time were conflated and represented as a systemic continuous pattern of cheating.

The fact of the matter is that the lengths and contortions that the athletic department went through to maintain Fab's eligibity is evidence that there was no intention to cheat.  They all obviously knew that what they were doing was unusual but instead of just fixing the books they tried to find a way to get him eligible compliantly.    Read the report, all the meetings, all the oversight, were found to be proper, it only crossed the line when the director of operations took it upon himself to close the action instead of Fab completing the work.   There is no evidence that he was directed to do that, in fact I wouldn't be surprised if actions out of the meeting explicitly stated, "make sure he does this himself".

If SU was such a corrupt renegade program, where are all the recruiting violations?

Your standard blogger posing as a journo is not equipped to understand the basics, let alone the obfuscation contained within that overlong BS indictment.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?