Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="miamicuse, post: 4208037, member: 7237"] I take it to mean that his kids were good because they played better than he expected. The team wasn't good because the team didn't play to his expectation as a whole. It's easy to take both and deduce that in order for his team to suck and his kids be good, the rest of the players must really suck. I doubt that's what he meant, but it's really clumsy and badly constructed. I wish he said the team isn't good as a whole because he didn't do what it takes for them to meet or exceed his expectation. He certainly did enough to make sure his kids can excel. [/QUOTE]