Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="PoppyHart, post: 1666864, member: 515"] If you were to have read my post, you would see that you actually agreed with it! My post simply pointed out that IF they were to win 2 of their final 3 games, they'd be a tournament team. The unstated rationale, as I'm sure you're able to deduce, is that it would imply a 12-6 record in the Big 10 with wins over UK, UM, and some combination of MSU * 2 or MSU + Iowa. If that is not a tournament team in 2016 then I'd eat my hat. You agreed that scenario put them on the "right side of the bubble". Indeed, you agreed they were "in the discussion" with merely one win. Yet you somehow figured out a way to bifurcate "in the discussion" and "very much in play". An amazing grasp of the nuances of the English language if ever I've seen. Please point to where I said OSU had a "decent resume", which I interpret to mean an NCAA tournament resume, prior to those 3 games being contested. [/QUOTE]