Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Nick44, post: 3607740, member: 540"] There’s a huge difference. Our classes historically rank 55-60 which is usually rock bottom in the ACC. We do not need top 25, but we do need a consistent top 40 class each year. If we currently average 1 4-star, 15 3-stars and 5 2-star/unrated players, a top 40 class would be 3-4 4-stars, 15-17 3-stars and 1-2 2-star/unrated players. If that becomes consistent, this team solves its longstanding depth issues. I agree that recruiting is subjective (thankfully because if it was an exact science we would be screwed) but the improvement would yield approximately 4-5 players per class that you can expect to come in and be multi-year starters early. As opposed to 5-10 players each class which need 2-3 years before they are ready. That’s the difference. [/QUOTE]